Feedback

Reliance into Action : Understanding EMA Documents to Streamline Reliance for Marketing Authorization Applications

Affiliation
Merck 1 route de Crassier 1262 Eysins Switzerland
Poulard, Isabelle Colmagne;
Affiliation
Roche Grenzacher Strasse 124 4070 Basel Switzerland
Ausborn, Susanne;
Affiliation
European Medicines Agency (EMA) Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 1083 HS Amsterdam The Netherlands
Allchurch, Martin Harvey;
Affiliation
European Medicines Agency (EMA) Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 1083 HS Amsterdam The Netherlands
Palmi, Victoria;
Affiliation
European Medicines Agency (EMA) Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 1083 HS Amsterdam The Netherlands
Ganan, Alberto;
Affiliation
MSD Boulevard du Souverain 25 1170 Brussels Belgium
Joos, Angelika;
Affiliation
GSK 20 Avenue Fleming 1300 Wavre Belgium
Deavin, Andrew;
Affiliation
Alexion Av. Diagonal, 615, Les Corts 08028 Barcelona Spain
Beauchesne, Corentin;
Affiliation
Astra Zeneca City House, Hills Rd Cambridge UK
Shah, Priti;
Affiliation
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) Neo Building, Rue Montoyer 51, box 3 1000 Bruxelles Belgium
Krishnan, Jyothsna;
Affiliation
Sartorius Am Flughafen 16 79108 Freiburg Germany
Askri, Chaima

Abstract According to data gathered from across EU pharmaceutical trade associations, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is one of the most frequently selected reference regulatory authority (RRA) for reliance procedures due its transparency, detailed decision-making reflected on its public assessment reports and easy access to information related to the assessment of medicines. This review discusses the implementation of unilateral reliance pathways for marketing authorization applications (MAAs) based on EMA assessment. The EMA established a focus group dedicated to reliance in 2022, with the primary aim of understanding the opportunities and hurdles encountered by European industry when using the EMA as RRA in global regulatory filings. A survey conducted among industry stakeholders revealed significant benefits of reliance pathways, including reduced approval timelines and decreased inquiries from relying authorities. However, the survey also highlighted persistent hurdles that hinder the benefits of unilateral reliance pathway, such as variability in documentation requirements and a lack of consistency across the documents requested by each national regulatory authority (NRA) when relying on EMA assessment. The findings highlight the need for collaboration between regulatory authorities and industry to streamline reliance processes and data requirements to make informed reliance decisions ultimately improving global access to safe, effective, and quality-assured medical products.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

License Holder: © The Author(s) 2025

Use and reproduction: