Feedback

Tailoring dual antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention: a meta-analysis of timing, duration, regimen, and stroke subtypes

Affiliation
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences ,College of Applied Medical Sciences ,King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences ,Riyadh ,Saudi Arabia
Alhawiti, Naif M.;
Affiliation
Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University ,Melbourne ,VIC ,Australia
Fouda, Sherouk;
Affiliation
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center ,Riyadh ,Saudi Arabia
Alotaibi, Naser D.;
Affiliation
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology ,College of Pharmacy ,Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University ,Al-Kharj ,Saudi Arabia
Madkhali, Hassan A.;
Affiliation
College of Medicine ,King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences ,Riyadh ,Saudi Arabia
Alsharef, Fahad K.;
Affiliation
College of Medicine ,Aljouf University ,Aljouf ,Saudi Arabia
Alhawiti, Jamal M.;
Affiliation
College of Public Health and Health Informatics ,King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences ,Riyadh ,Saudi Arabia
El-Metwally, Ashraf

Background Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is commonly used for secondary stroke prevention, but the optimal timing and duration of treatment remain uncertain. This meta-analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of DAPT compared to any single antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients. We examined the effectiveness of DAPT versus monotherapy, stratified by stroke type, timing of intervention onset, and duration of DAPT. Methods We systematically searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DAPT with any single antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients. Data from 30 RCTs involving 75,504 patients were pooled using a random-effects model. The key outcomes were recurrent ischemic stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and major bleeding. Additional studied outcomes included hemorrhagic stroke and mortality. Subgroup analysis examined the effectiveness of DAPT versus any single antiplatelet therapy, stratified by stroke type (ischemic stroke, lacunar stroke, and TIA or ischemic stroke), timing of intervention onset (within 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 7–180 days), duration of DAPT (short-term: up to 30 days; long-term: beyond 30 days) and DAPT regimens (Aspirin and Clopidogrel, Aspirin and Cilostazol, Aspirin and Dipyridamole, and Clopidogrel and Cilostazol, etc.). Results DAPT significantly reduced recurrent ischemic stroke (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60–0.79) and MACE (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69–0.87), but did not significantly affect hemorrhagic stroke (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.80–2.07), major bleeding (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.91–1.33), or mortality (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.88–1.15). Subgroup analyses showed that aspirin plus clopidogrel reduced recurrent stroke (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59–0.82) and MACE (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75–0.91). Early DAPT initiation (within 12–24 h) significantly reduced recurrent ischemic stroke (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57–0.92 and RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52–0.84, respectively) and MACE (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62–0.98 and RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72–0.93, respectively), but increased major bleeding (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.10–4.86 and RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.20–1.49, respectively). Short-term DAPT (≤30 days) showed a greater reduction in recurrent ischemic events (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53–0.79) than long-term DAPT (>30 days; RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60–0.86). Conclusion DAPT effectively reduces recurrent ischemic stroke and MACE, especially when initiated within 12–24 h using aspirin plus clopidogrel. Short-term DAPT (≤30 days) may be optimal for recurrent stroke prevention. Clinicians should carefully weigh benefits and risks when personalizing DAPT strategies.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

License Holder: Copyright © 2025 Alhawiti, Fouda, Alotaibi, Madkhali, Alsharef, Alhawiti and El-Metwally.

Use and reproduction: