Feedback

Patient Engagement and Patient Experience Data in Regulatory Review and Health Technology Assessment: A Global Landscape Review

Affiliation
HTAi Patient & Citizen Involvement in HTA Interest Group Neil Bertelsen Consulting Berlin Germany
Bertelsen, Neil;
Affiliation
Independent Expert Les Contamines-Montjoie France
Dewulf, Lode;
Affiliation
National Kidney Foundation New York NY USA
Ferrè, Silvia;
Affiliation
Roche Pharmaceuticals Redwood City CA USA
Vermeulen, Rebecca;
Affiliation
Independent Patient Representative Jackson Heights NY USA
Schroeder, Karlin;
Affiliation
National Cancer Center Japan Tokyo Japan
Gatellier, Laureline;
Affiliation
Twist Medical Burlingame CA USA
Sargeant, Ify;
Affiliation
Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD) Brussels Belgium
Luzuriaga, Daniela;
ORCID
0009-0003-9961-1943
Affiliation
Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD) Brussels Belgium
Chapman, Hayley;
Affiliation
Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD) Brussels Belgium
Brooke, Nicholas

Abstract Background Working with patients through meaningful patient engagement (PE) and incorporating patient experience data (PXD) is increasingly important in medicines and medical device development. However, PE in the planning, organization, generation, and interpretation of PXD within regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) decision-making processes remains challenging. We conducted a global review of the PE and PXD landscape to identify evolving resources by geography to support and highlight the potential of integration of PE and PXD in regulatory assessment and HTA. Methods A review of literature/public information was conducted (August 2021–January 2023), led by a multistakeholder group comprising those with lived or professional experience of PE and PXD, to identify relevant regulatory and HTA initiatives and resources reviewed and categorized by geography and focus area. Results Overall, 53 relevant initiatives/resources were identified (global, 14; North America, 11; Europe, 11; Asia, nine; UK, six; Latin America, one; Africa, one). Most focused either on PE (49%) or PXD (28%); few (11%) mentioned both PE and PXD (as largely separate activities) or demonstrated an integration of PE and PXD (11%). Conclusions Our analysis demonstrates increasing interest in PE, PXD, and guidance on their use individually in decision-making. However, more work is needed to offer guidance on maximizing the value of patient input into decisions by combining both PE and PXD into regulatory and HTA processes; the necessity of integrating PE in the design and interpretation of PXD programs should be highlighted. A co-created framework to achieve this integration is part of a future project.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

License Holder: © The Author(s) 2023

Use and reproduction: