Feedback

Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia epistaxis

Affiliation
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University ,Zhanjiang ,Guangdong ,China
Chen, Huimin;
Affiliation
The People’s Hospital of JiangMen ,Jiangmen Hospital ,Southern Medical University ,Jiangmen ,China
Zhang, Zhiping;
Affiliation
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University ,Guangzhou ,Guangdong ,China
Chen, Xiaojuan;
Affiliation
Taishan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine ,Jiangmen ,Guangdong ,China
Wang, Chaoyu;
Affiliation
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University ,Zhanjiang ,Guangdong ,China
Chen, Mingdi;
Affiliation
State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease ,National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease ,Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health ,The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University ,Guangzhou ,Guangdong ,China
Liao, Huizhao;
Affiliation
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University ,Zhanjiang ,Guangdong ,China
Zhu, Jinru;
Affiliation
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University ,Zhanjiang ,Guangdong ,China
Zheng, Zhenzhen;
Affiliation
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University ,Zhanjiang ,Guangdong ,China
Chen, Riken

Objective: A meta-analysis is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) epistaxis. Method: Two researchers search PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases from their inception until September 3th, 2023. The literature is read and screened, and valid data extracted, collated and analyzed. Its quality is then assessed using the Cochrane risk assessment scale. This study uses Endnote 9.3 software for literature management and RevMan 5.3.1 software for evaluation. Results: A total of 7 documents met the requirements, including a total of 359 patients, and the literature quality evaluation was grade B. The Meta-analysis results showed that:Bevacizumab reduces the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) in patients with HHT epistaxis compared with the control [WMD = −0.22,95%CI (−0.38, −0.05), p = 0.01]. However, there is no significant effect on duration of epistaxis [WMD = −15.59, 95%CI (−70.41,39.23), p = 0.58] and number of epistaxes [WMD = −1.27,95%CI (−10.23,7.70), p = 0.78] in patients with HHT epistaxis. In terms of adverse effects, there is no significant difference between the bevacizumab group and control group [OR = 1.36, 95% CI (0.54, 3.44), p = 0.52]. Conclusion: Bevacizumab is superior to the control group in the treatment of HHT epistaxis, and adverse reactions are not further increased in the bevacizumab group than in the control group, suggesting that bevacizumab has clinical value in the treatment of HHT epistaxis.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

License Holder: Copyright © 2023 Chen, Zhang, Chen, Wang, Chen, Liao, Zhu, Zheng and Chen.

Use and reproduction: