Feedback

Molecular characterization based on tumor microenvironment-related signatures for guiding immunotherapy and therapeutic resistance in lung adenocarcinoma

Affiliation
Department of Radiation Oncology ,The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University ,Harbin ,China
Jie, Yamin;
Affiliation
Department of Radiation Oncology ,Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital ,Harbin ,China
Wu, Jianing;
Affiliation
Department of Radiation Oncology ,The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University ,Harbin ,China
An, Dongxue;
Affiliation
Department of Endoscopy ,Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital ,Harbin ,China
Li, Man;
Affiliation
Department of Head and Neck Surgery ,Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital ,Harbin ,China
He, Hongjiang;
Affiliation
Department of Neurology ,The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University ,Harbin ,China
Wang, Duo;
Affiliation
Department of Radiation Oncology ,Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital ,Harbin ,China
Gu, Anxin;
Affiliation
Department of Radiation Oncology ,Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital ,Harbin ,China
E, Mingyan

Background: Although the role of tumor microenvironment in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has been explored in a number of studies, the value of TME-related signatures in immunotherapy has not been comprehensively characterized. Materials and Methods: Consensus clustering was conducted to characterize TME-based molecular subtypes using transcription data of LUAD samples. The biological pathways and immune microenvironment were assessed by CIBERSORT, ESTIMATE, and gene set enrichment analysis. A TME-related risk model was established through the algorithms of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) and stepwise Akaike information criterion (stepAIC). Results: Four TME-based molecular subtypes including C1, C2, C3, and C4 were identified, and they showed distinct overall survival, genomic characteristics, DNA methylation pattern, immune microenvironment, and biological pathways. C1 had the worst prognosis and high tumor proliferation rate. C3 and C4 had higher enrichment of anti-tumor signatures compared to C1 and C2. C4 had evidently low enrichment of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) signature and tumor proliferation rate. C3 was predicted to be more sensitive to immunotherapy compared with other subtypes. C1 is more sensitive to chemotherapy drugs, including Docetaxel, Vinorelbine and Cisplatin, while C3 is more sensitive to Paclitaxel. A five-gene risk model was constructed, which showed a favorable performance in three independent datasets. Low-risk group showed a longer overall survival, more infiltrated immune cells, and higher response to immunotherapy than high-risk group. Conclusion: This study comprehensively characterized the molecular features of LUAD patients based on TME-related signatures, demonstrating the potential of TME-based signatures in exploring the mechanisms of LUAD development. The TME-related risk model was of clinical value to predict LUAD prognosis and guide immunotherapy.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

License Holder: Copyright © 2023 Jie, Wu, An, Li, He, Wang, Gu and E.

Use and reproduction: